India has one of the largest and diverse education systems in the world. Privatization, widespread expansion, increased autonomy and introduction of Programmes in new and emerging areas have improved access to higher education. At the same time, it has also led to widespread concern on the quality and relevance of the higher education. To address these concerns, the National Policy on Education (NPE, 1986) and the Programme of Action (PoA, 1992) spelt out strategic plans for the policies, advocated the establishment of an independent National accreditation agency. Consequently, the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) was established in 1994 as an autonomous institution of the University Grants Commission (UGC) with its Head Quarter in Bengaluru. The mandate of NAAC as reflected in its vision statement is in making quality assurance an integral part of the functioning of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).
The NAAC functions through its General Council (GC) and Executive Committee (EC) comprising educational administrators, policy makers and senior academicians from a cross-section of Indian higher education system. The Chairperson of the UGC is the President of the GC of the NAAC, the Chairperson of the EC is an eminent academician nominated by the President of GC (NAAC). The Director is the academic and administrative head of NAAC and is the member-secretary of both the GC and the EC. In addition to the statutory bodies that steer its policies and core staff to support its activities NAAC is advised by the advisory and consultative committees constituted from time to time.
1.1. | Number of courses offered by the institution across all programs during the last five years |
2.1. | Number of students year-wise during last five years |
2.2. | Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/State Gvt rule year-wise during last five years |
2020-2021 | |
2019-2020 | |
2018-2019 | |
2017-2018 | |
2016-2017 | |
2.3. | Number of outgoing/final year students year-wise during last five years |
3.1. | Number of full time teachers year-wise during last five years |
3.2. | Number of sanctioned posts year-wise during last five years |
2020-2021 | |
2019-2020 | |
2018-2019 | |
2017-2018 | |
2016-2017 |
1.2.1 | Percentage of Programmes in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS)/ elective course system has been implemented | 10 |
a). Ordinance | ||
b). Additional information | ||
1.2.2 | Number of Add on /Certificate programs offered during the last five years | 10 |
a). Brouchre | ||
b). Additional information | ||
1.2.3. | Average percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Add-on programs as against the total number of students during the last five years | 10 |
1.4.1 | Institution obtains feedback on the syllabus and its transaction at the institution from the stakeholders | 10 |
1.4.2 | Feedback process of the Institution | 10 |
2.2.1 | The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners | 30 |
2.2.2 | Student- Full time teacher ratio | 20 |
2.7.1 | Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. | 60 |
4.3.1 | Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi | 5 |
4.3.2 | Student – Computer ratio | 10 |
4.3.3. | Bandwidth of internet connection in the Institution | 15 |
6.4.1 | Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly | 6 |
6.4.3 | Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources | 6 |
7.2.1 | Two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual. | 30 |
7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | 20 |
Copyright © 2025 | All Rights Reserved.